HEDEF KALDIRACA UYUM HIZI: FARKLI SEKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ANALİZ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-131
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2022-08-09 23:29:04.0
Language : Türkçe
Konu : Finans
Number of pages: 220-233
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Optimal sermaye yapısını açıklamaya yönelik geliştirilen Dinamik Ödünleşme Teorisi, Statik Ödünleşme Teorisi’nden farklı olarak firmaların, zaman içerisinde hedef kaldıraçtan sapabileceğini ve daha sonra bu hedefe tekrar dönmek için uyum davranışları sergileyeceklerini ileri sürmektedir. Dinamik Ödünleşme Teorisi’nin temelini oluşturan hedef kaldıraç ve hedef kaldıraca uyum hızı (SOA-speed of adjustment),  gelişmiş ülkelere kıyasla gelişmekte olan ülkelerde daha az sayıda çalışmada araştırılmıştır. Buradan hareketle bu çalışmada; 2010-2020 yılları arasında Borsa İstanbul’da işlem gören kimya, tekstil, taş-toprak ve gıda sektöründeki firmalarda Dinamik Ödünleşme Teorisi’nin geçerliliği sınanmıştır. Dört farklı sektörde hedef kaldıracın varlığı ve hedef kaldıracın varlığı hâlinde uyum hızının sektörler arasında nasıl bir davranış sergilediği, iki aşamalı sistem Genelleştirilmiş Momentler Metodu tahmincisiyle analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analizler neticesinde elde edilen bulgulara göre, gıda ve taş-toprak sektöründe firmalar hedef kaldıraca yönelik ayarlamalar yapmaktadır. Ancak bu sektörlerde hedef kaldıraca uyum hızı farklı seviyelerdedir. Tekstil sektörüne ilişkin bulgular, bu sektörde faaliyet gösteren firmaların hedef kaldıraca yönelik hareket etmediklerini ve hedef kaldıraçtan uzaklaştıklarını göstermektedir.

Keywords

Abstract

The Dynamic Trade-off Theory, which was developed to explain the optimal capital structure, argues that unlike the Static Trade-off Theory, firms may deviate from the target leverage over time and then exhibit adaptive behaviors to return to this target again. Target leverage and target leverage speed of adjustment (SOA-speed of adjustment) which forms the basis of Dynamic Trade-off Theory, have been investigated in fewer studies in developing countries compared to developed countries. From this point of view in this study; The validity of the Dynamic Trade-off Theory was tested with companies from the chemical, textile, stone - soil and food sectors traded in Istanbul Stock Exchange between 2010-2020. The behavior of target leverage and speed of adjusment to target leverage in four different sectors was analyzed with the two-step system Generalized Moments Method. According to the results of the analysis, companies in the food and stone-soil sector make adjustments for target leverage. However the speed of adjustment to the target leverage is at different levels in these sectors. Findings regarding the textile sector show that the companies operating in this sector do not act towards the target leverage and they move away from the target leverage.

Keywords


  • Abdeljawad, I. vd. (2013). Dynamic capital structure trade-off theory: evidence from Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 9(6):102-110.

  • Açar Cevheroğlu, M. G. (2021). The determinants of the adjustment speed towards target leverage ratio: evidence from Turkey. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, 658: 101-136.

  • Antoniou, A., Guney, Y. & Paudyal, K. (2008). The determinants of capital structure: capital market-oriented versus bank-oriented institutions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(1): 59-92.

  • Arioglu, E. & Tuan, K. (2014). Speed of adjustment: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Borsa Istanbul Review, 14(2): 126-131.

  • Baxter, N. D. (1967). Leverage, risk, of ruin and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance: 395-403.

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1): 115-143.

  • Demir, N. (2019). Dynamics of capital structure: An empirical analysis of Turkish banking sector. Master’s Thesis, Sabancı University Institute of Social Sciences.

  • De Miguel, A. Pindado J. (2001). Determinants of capital structure: new evidence from Spanish panel data. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7: 77-99.

  • Etudaiye-Muhtar, O. F & Ahmad, R. (2015). Empirical evidence of target leverage, adjustment costs and adjustment speed of non-financial firms in selected African countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2): 482–488.

  • Fischer, O. E, Heinkel, R. & Zechner, J. (1989). Dynamic capital structure choice: theory and tests. The Journal of Finance, 44(1): 19-40. Flannery, M. J. & Rangan, K. P. (2006). Partial adjustment toward target capital structures. Journal of Financial Economics, 79: 469–506

  • Getzmann, A., Lang, S. & Spremann, K. (2010). Determinants of the target capital structure and adjustment speed– evidence from asian capital markets. Paper Presented at the European Financial Management Symposium.

  • Ghazouani, T. (2013), The capital structure through the trade-off theory: evidence from Tunisian firm. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(3), 625-636.

  • Haron, R., vd. (2013). Factors affecting speed of adjustment to target leverage: Malaysia evidence. Global Business Review, 14(2), 243-262.

  • Hovakimian, A., Opler, T. & Titman, S. (2001), The debt-equity choice. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(1), 1-24.

  • Huang, R. & Ritter, J. R. (2009). testing theories of capital structure and estimating the speed of adjustment. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(2): 237-271.

  • Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.

  • Kamila, N. & Gandakusuma, I. (2020). Factors affecting target leverage in companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2014 to 2018. Doi: https://eudl.eu/pdf/10.4108/eai.227-2020.2307929

  • Karadeniz, E.,vd. (2009). Determinants of capital structure: evidence from Turkish lodging companies. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21(5): 594–609.

  • Kim, H., Heshmati, A. & Aun, D. (2006). Dynamics of capital structure: the case of Korean listed manufacturing companies. Asian Economic Journal, 20(3): 275-302.

  • Kraus, A. & Litzenberger, R. H. (1973). A state–preference model of optimal financial leverage. Journal of Finance, 28(4): 911-922.

  • Mayo, V., Wolmorans, H. & Brummer, L. (2013). Trade-off or Pecking Order: evidence from South African manufacturing, mining, and retail firms. International Business & Economic Research Journal, 12(8): 927-944.

  • Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 574-592.

  • Naveed, M., vd. (2015). Factors affecting the speed of adjustment under different economic conditions - dynamic capital structure sensitivity analysis. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 8(3): 165 - 182.

  • Öztekin, Ö. & Flannery, M. J. (2012). Institutional determinants of capital structure adjustment speeds. Journal of financial economics, 103(1), 88-112.

  • Ramjee, A. & Gwatidzo, T. (2012). Dynamics in capital structure determinants in South Africa. Meditari Accountancy Research, 20(1), 52-67.

  • Robichek, A. A. & Myers, S. C. (1966). Problems in the theory of optimal capital structure. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1(2): 1-35.

  • Yılmaz, H. (2022). Dinamik sermaye yapısı belirleyicileri ve optimal kaldıraç oranı uyarlama hızı: Türkiye’de finans şirketleri üzerine bir çalışma. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi - Istanbul Journal of Economics, 72(1): 1-19.

  • Yildiz, Y. (2018). Adjustment to target capital structure and global financial crisis: Evidence from Turkey. Business and Economics Research Journal, 9(3), 543–557.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics