Author :
Abstract
Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, yabancı dil bağlamında Türk lisans öğrencilerinin yazma stratejisi tercihlerini incelemektir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, yabancı dil bağlamında Türk lisans öğrencilerinin yazma stratejisi tercihlerini incelemektir. Amaç, İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak kullanan öğrenciler tarafından yazma stratejilerinin yazma öncesinde, yazma sırasında veya sonrasında hangi sırayla tercih edildiğini belirlemektir. Bu çalışma aynı zamanda öğrenciler tarafından kullanılan strateji türünün sıklığını da belirlemeyi hedeflemektedir. Mevcut çalışmanın katılımcıları, İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümünde eğitim gören 80 öğrencidir. Çalışma, öğrencilerin yazma stratejilerini yazma sırasında, sonrasında ve öncesinde sırasıyla kullandığını ortaya koymuştur. Çalışmanın sonucunda en az tercih edilen strateji türleri yazma öncesi aşamasında, en çok kullanılanlar ise yazma süreci aşamasındadır.
Keywords
Abstract
The main aim of this study is to examine Turkish undergraduate students’ writing strategy preferences within foreign language context. The purpose is to determine whether before, while or after writing strategies are preferred respectively at three different stages of writing process by students majoring in English as a foreign language. This study also aims to identify the frequency of strategy type by students. The participants of the present study were 80 students of English language and Literature Department in Turkey. The study revealed that students employed during writing, post writing and before writing strategies respectively. That is, the least preferred strategies are at before writing stage while the most used ones are that of during writing stage of the writing process.
Keywords
- Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160.
- Dujisik, D. (2008). The effect of prewriting strategy training guided by computer-based proce- dural facilitation on ESL students’ strategy use, writing quantity and writing quality (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/221.
- Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Fidalgo, R., Torrance, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H., & Álvarez, M. L. (2015). Strat- egy-focused writing instruction: Just observing and reflecting on a modelbenefits 6th grade students.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 3750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.004.
- Hu, G. W., & Chen, B. (2007). A protocol-based study of university-level Chinese EFL learn- ers’ writing strategies. English Australia Journal, 23(2), 37-35. Retrieved from http://qa.englishaustralia.com.au/index.cgi?E=hcatfuncs&PT=sl&X=getdoc&Lev1=pu b_jour_23_&Lev.
- Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 17-29.
- Maarof, N., & Murat, M. (2015). Writing strategies used by ESL upper secondary school stu- dents. Canadian center of science and education. International Education Studie, 6(4),47-58. doi: 10.5539/ies.v6n4p47.
- Nunan, D. (1998). Language teaching methodology. London: Prentice Hall.
- Petric,B. &Czarl, V. (2003) Validating a writing strategy questionnaire. System 31(2):187- 215.Doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00020-4
- Porto, M. (2001). Cooperative writing response groups and self-evaluation. ELT Journal 55/1: 38–46.
- Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of com- posing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 229-258.http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2307/3586828.
- Raschiti, M. (2011). Writing revision strategies: Do they enhance writing ability?.Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/29213887.
- Ridhuan, M., & Abdullah, T. L. (2009). The writing strategies used by Engineering ESL from http://eprints.utp.edu.my/2035/.
- Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15-30). Englewood, NJ: Prentice/Hall International
- Stern, H.H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching (edited posthumously by Patrick Allen & Birgit Harley). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- O’Mealia, S. (2011). How can prewriting strategies benefit students?. Education Masters. Paper 14. Retrieved from : https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/education_ETD_masters/14
- Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
- Tangpermpoon, T. (2008). Integrated approaches to improve students writing skills for Eng- lish major students. ABAC Journal, 28(2): 1-9.
- Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
- Wenden, A., & J. Rubin (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. London: Prentice/Hall International.
- Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL learners: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165-187.
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 1-12). New York: Routledge.
