SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR PLANLAMA VE KÜLTÜREL MİRAS İLİŞKİSİ: TEORİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME ÇERÇEVESİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2019 -97
Language : null
Konu : Mimarlık, Planlama / Kültürel Miras ve Sürdürülebilirlik
Number of pages: 364-380
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Kültürel/kentsel mirasa sahip şehirlerin, kent planlarında sürdürülebilir planlama için kültürel mirasın korunmasını gerekli bir amaç olarak algılaması koruma açısından hayati bir öneme sahiptir. Bu süreç, kültürel mirası koruma programının sürdürülebilir bir yaklaşımla ele alınmasını zorunlu kılmaktadır. Geçmişten günümüze kadar tecrübelerimiz kültürel mirası koruma planlamasının, sürdürülebilir planlama çalışmalarına olumlu katkıları olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu da ancak doğal ve kültürel mirasın önemli faktörlerini planlama vasıtasıyla, korumak ve geliştirmekle mümkündür. Sürdürülebilir kentsel gelişim ile bağlantılı olarak çevrenin korunması, kültürel / kentsel miras, doğal miras, kültürel peyzaj gibi konuların da canlandırılması, mirasın geleceği için olumlu bir gelişmedir. Bu çalışmada, teorik bir değerlendirme çerçevesi oluşturulacak ve bu çerçeve, çevresel ve kültürel mirası korumayı amaçlayacaktır; miras ise sosyo - kültürel ve ekonomik kaynak, ekolojik ve sosyal değer olarak kabul edilececektir. Bu çalışmaya göre, çevresel, ekonomik ve sosyo-kültürel bileşenleri içeren sürdürülebilir planlama, aynı zamanda kültürel varlıkların sürdürülebilirliğini de sağlamayı amaç edinmelidir. Sürdürülebilirlik verilerinin kullanımı bu planlama sürecinde kaçınılmazdır. Bu çerçevede yapılan bu çalışmada, sürdürülebilir kentleşme için önemli bir araç olarak sürdürülebilir planlama ele alınmakta ve bu kavramın kültürel mirasın korunması ve yeniden değerlendirilmesini içermesinin gereklililiği tartışmaya açılmaktadır. Bu teze göre, kültürel mirasın tanımı gereği sürdürülebilirlik için önemli bir kaynak teşkil etmekte ve bu mirasın içeriği sürdürülebilir kentleşme planlaması açısından önemli bir katkı olarak kabul edilmektedir. Dolayısıyla, konu bu tez çerçevesinde ele alınacaktır.

Keywords

Abstract

It has vital importance fort he protection that cities with cultural/urban heritage perceive the protection of the cultural heritage as a necessary aim for the sustainable and total planning in urban plans. That obliges the protection program of cultural heritage to be in a sustainable approach. From past to present many opinions have showed that the studies of protection planning of cultural heritage have positive contributions as well as studies of sustainable planning. It is possible via planning, protecting and extending the important factors of the natural and cultural heritage. It is a positive development for the future of the heritage that reviving the subjects such as protecting environment, cultural/ urban heritage, natural heritage, cultural landscape in connection with sustainable urban development. In this study, a theoretical assessment framework shall be created and this framework shall aim to protect the environmental and cultural heritage; and to consider heritage as socio - cultural and economic resource, and an ecological and social value. According to this study, sustainable planning involving environmental, economic and socio-cultural components should also aim to ensure the sustainability of cultural assets. The usage of data related to sustainability is inevitable within this planning process. This study within this framework addresses sustainable planning as an important tool for sustainable urbanization; and one issue to be discussed within this concept is that whether it should contain the protection and the new assessment period of cultural heritage. According to a thesis, the definition of cultural heritage represents an important resource for sustainability, while the content of this heritage is to be considered as an important contribution in terms of sustainable urbanization planning. Therefore, the topic shall be considered within the framework of this thesis.

Keywords


  • Albrechts, L., (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31 (5) 743-58.

  • Aoyagi, K., Nas, P. J. M. and Traphagan, J. W. (eds.) (1998). Toward Sustainable Cities: Readings in the Anthropology of Urban Environments. Leiden: Institute of Cultural and Social Studies, University of Leiden.

  • Ashworth, G. J. and Tunbridge, J. E. (2000) The Tourist–Historic City:Retrospect and Prospect of Managing the Heritage City, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

  • BEAM, (2016). BEAM Plus Existing Buildings Version 2.0, Selective Scheme, HKGBC & BEAM Society Ltd, Hong Kong, pp.13-15

  • BREEAM, (2017). BREEAM International New Construction 2016 / Technical Manual, Do- cument reference: SD233, BRE Global Ltd. Watford, UK, pp.1-31

  • Chohan A. Y., and Wai Ki, P., (2005) Heritage Conservation a tool for Sustainable Urban Regeneration: A Case study of Kaohsiung and Tainan, 41st ISoCaRP Congress 2005, Taiwan

  • Coccossis, H.. and P. Nijkamp (eds.) (1995). Planning for Our Cultural Heritage. Avebury, Aldershot.

  • COE (2001). The Council of Europe and cultural heritage 1954-2000, Final Declaration on the Political Dimension of Cultural heritage Conservation in Europe (Helsinki Declaration 1996); Director of the Publication:Jose Marie Ballester, pp:311-318, Strasbourg Cedex:Council of Europe Publishing,

  • CSH, (2008). Code for Sustainable Homes, Technical guide, Communities and Local Go- vernment Publications / West Yorkshire, RIBA Publishing, London, pp.10-35

  • COE, (1992). European Urban Charter, adopted by the Council of Europe's Standing Con- ference of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe (CLRAE) on 18 March 1992, Strasbourg

  • C2C, (2013). Cradle to Cradle Certified Product Standard (Version 3.0), The Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute, Prepared by McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, LLC (MBDC).& Environmental Protection Encouragement Agency, GmbH, pp.1-85

  • DGNB, (2016), The DGNB Brand Environment, DGNB GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany, pp.15

  • Diker, O., (2016). Kültürel Miras İle Kültürel Miras Turizmi Kavramları Üzerine Kavramsal Bir Çalışma. The Journal of Academic Social Science / Asos Journal, 4, (30), s. 365- 374

  • EEA, (1995): Europe's Environment: The Dobris Assessment. European Environment Agency, (EEA), Copenhagen.

  • EC, (1996). European Sustainable Cities, Report by the Expert Group on the Urban Envi- ronment, European Commission, 1996, Italy

  • EC, (1998), European Commission, Sustainable Urban Development in the European Union: A Framework for Action, Communication from the Commission, To the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions), 1998, Brussels, Belgium,

  • English Heritage, (2003). Heritage Counts 2003: The State of the Historic Environment, http://www.english-heritage.org.uk (07.02.2010).

  • Estidama, (2010). The Pearl Rating System for Estidama, Building Rating System, Design & Construction, Version 1.0, Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council, April, 2010, Emirate of Abu Dhabi, pp.5-15

  • France GBC, (2015). International Environmental Certifications For The Design And Construction Of Non-Residential Buildings, June 2015, France GBC, Paris, pp.5

  • Green Globes, (2004). Design for New Buildings and Retrofits, Rating System and Program Summary, ECD Energy & Environment , Canada Ltd. Toronto, pp.1-5

  • Green Globes, (2018). Green Globes For New Construction, Technical Reference Manual, The Green Building Initiative Inc. LLC, Portland, Oregon, pp.8-14

  • Green Star, (2013). Green Star Performance, Introducing Australia’s most comprehensive rating tool for sustainable building operations, Green Building Council of Australia, Sydney NSW, pp.4

  • Gündüz, F., (2004). Çevre ve Turizmin Sürdürülebilirliği. Planlama, TBMMOB Şehir Plan- cıları Odası Yayını, sayı:27, Temmuz 2004, s.59.

  • Hassler, U., Algreen-Ussing, G., Kohler, N., (2002). Cultural heritage and sustainable deve- lopment in SUIT, SUIT Position Paper (3) , Septembre 2002, (Sustainable Development of Urban historic areas through and active Integration within Towns, SUIT project is supported by the EU Program “Environment and Sustainable Development),

  • Keleş, R., Hamamcı, C., Çoban, A., (2005). Çevre Politikası, İmge Kitabevi Yayınları, Ankara

  • Kocabaş, A., (1994). Urban Conservation for Sustainable Development Towards a Research Agenda, Architecture and Planning in the Developing World, University of York

  • Larkham, P. J. (1996). Conservation and the City, Routledge Press, London.

  • Lautso, K., Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M., (2004). Planning and Research of Policies for Land Use and Transport for Increasing Urban Sustainability (PROPOLIS), DG Research, European Commission under the Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development Thematic Programme of the Fifth RTD Framework Programme, 2004, Brussels, Belgium,

  • Lautso, K., Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M., (2002). Modelling Policies for Urban Susta- inability. The 42nd Congress of the European Regional Science Association (ERSA), 27-31 August 2002, Dortmund

  • Nijkamp, P. ve Perrels, A., (1994). Sustainable Cities in Europe:A Comparative Analysis of Urban Energy-Environmental Policies, Earthscan, London.

  • Ng, M. K., Cook, A. and Chui, W. T. (2001), The Road Not Travelled: A Sustainable Urban Regeneration Strategy for Hong Kong, Planning Practice and Research, Volume 16, Issue 2 May 2001, Pp. 171 – 183

  • NSW, (2004). Heritage and Sustainability, A Discussion Paper, NSW Heritage Office, New South Wales, Parramatta

  • Osmanoğlu, İ., (2019a) : Sustainable Construction As A Strategy Of Real Estate Marketing: A Case Study In Istanbul. Journal Of Social, Humanities And Administrative Sciences, 5(16), pp.527-536. http://dx.doi.org/10.31589/JOSHAS.128

  • Osmanoğlu, İ., (2019b). Cultural And Natural Heritage As Inputs Of Sustainable Planning. Social Sciences Studies Journal, 5(38), pp.3480-3493. http://dx.doi.org/10.26449/sssj.1594

  • Osmanoğlu, İ., (2019c). The Environmental Assessment Methods In The Context Of Susta- inable Construction. Social Mentality And Researcher Thinkers Journal, 5(19), pp.805-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.31576/smryj.279

  • Resmi Gazete/17635, (1982). 2634 sayılı Turizmi Teşvik Kanunu, Resmi Gazete, Tarih: 16.03.1982, Sayı: 17635

  • Resmi Gazete/18785, (1985). 3213 Sayılı Maden Kanunu, Resmi Gazete, Tarih; 15.6.1985, Sayı:18785

  • Resmi Gazete/22249, (1995). Orman Arazilerinin Tahsisi Hakkında Yönetmelik, Resmi Gazete, Tarih:05.04.1995, Sayı: :22249

  • Resmi Gazete/27005, (2008). Turizm İşletmesi Belgeli Konaklama Tesislerine Çevreye Duyarlı Konaklama Tesisi Belgesi Verilmesine Dair Tebliğ (Tebliğ No:2008/3), Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, R. Gazete Tarih:22.09.2008, Sayı:27005

  • Rypkema D. (1999). Culture, Historic Preservation and Economic Development in the 21st Century. Paper submitted to the leadership conference on conservancy and development. Yunnan Province, China, September 1999.

  • Rypkema, D.(2005). Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Economic and Social Development, European Cultural Heritage Forum, December 7, 2005, Brussels, Belgium

  • Satterthwaite, D., (1997). Sustainable Cities or Cities that Contribute to Sustainable Deve- lopment?, Urban Studies, Vol.34, No.10, October 1997, p.1667–1691, Routledge:Kentucky

  • Steinberg F., (1996). Conservation and rehabilitation of urban heritage in developing countries, Habitat International, 20 (3) 463-75.

  • Şahin, İ. (2004). Türkiye'de Kentsel Koruma Politikalarının Gelişimine Yardımcı Bir Yöntem Denemesi Örnekleme: İstanbul Tarihi Yarımada. Doktora Tezi, İTÜ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul

  • Tiesdell, S., Oc, T. and Heath, T. (1996). Revitalizing Historic Urban Quarters. Architectural Press, Boston,

  • UN, (1996). Report Of The United Nations Conference On Human Settlements. UN Con- ference on Human Settlements/Habitat II, Istanbul (Turkey) 3-14 June 1996,

  • UN, (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Report of The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) , Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 June, (1992). UN General Assembly, A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I), 12 August 1992, NY.

  • UN, (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, UN, General Assembly, A/42/427, 4 August 1987. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Brundtland_Report;/https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or g/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.

  • UN, DESA, (2019). World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/423). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York, Published by the United Nations.

  • USGBC, (2009). USGBC LEED Green Associate Study Guide, U.S. Green Building Council, Washington, DC, pp.4-132

  • Welbank, M., (1987). Koruma ve Geliştirme (çev: R. Bademli), Konut ve Gelişme, Birleşmiş Milletler Türk Derneği Yayınları, No:14, Ankara, 183-199

  • WIT, (2000). The Sustainable City: 1st International Conference on Urban Regeneration and Sustainability, 25-27 April, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Wessex Institute of Technology, Southampton, UK

  • Wood, A., & Bruff, G., (2000). Local Sustainable Development: Land-use Planning’s Cont- ribution to Modern Local Government, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, C. 43, S.4

  • Yazar, K., H., (2006). Sürdürülebilir Kentsel Gelişme Çerçevesinde Orta Ölçekli Kentlere Dönük Kent Planlama Yöntem Önerisi, Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kamu Yönetimi Ve Siyaset Bilimi Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics