THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATIVITY LEVELS OF STUDENTS READING IN PRIVATE AND STATE SCHOOLS AND TEAC-HERS' CREATIVE THINKING LEVELS ÖZEL VE DEVLET OKULUNDA OKUYAN ÖĞRENCİLERİN YARATICILIK DÜZEYLERİ İLE ÖĞRETMENLERİN YARATICI DÜŞÜNCE DÜZEYLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ
In this research, it was aimed to examine differences between perceiving of Science teachers working at public and private schools on openness to change level of their schools. In the research, 317 science teachers working at private and public schools in Manisa under authority of National Education Ministry during 2016-2017 education year were subjected to survey. According to the results of the research; The level of creative thinking is statistically significant (p <0,05) in all teachers according to professional experience, graduation, creativity education status and school type. The level of creativity of students is higher in all schools in terms of statistically significant than private schools (p <0,05). There is a statistically significant and positive relationship between the creativity levels of teachers and all dimensions of creativity levels of students (p <0,05).
@article{2018,title={THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATIVITY LEVELS OF STUDENTS READING IN PRIVATE AND STATE SCHOOLS AND TEAC-HERS' CREATIVE THINKING LEVELS},abstractNode={In this research, it was aimed to examine differences between perceiving of Science teachers working at public and private schools on openness to change level of their schools. In the research, 317 science teachers working at private and public schools in Manisa under authority of National Education Ministry during 2016-2017 education year were subjected to survey. According to the results of the research; The level of creative thinking is statistically significant (p <0,05) in all teachers according to professional experience, graduation, creativity education status and school type. The level of creativity of students is higher in all schools in terms of statistically significant than private schools (p <0,05). There is a statistically significant and positive relationship between the creativity levels of teachers and all dimensions of creativity levels of students (p <0,05).},author={Rıdvan GÖREN},year={2018},journal={The Journal of Academic Social Science}}
Rıdvan GÖREN . 2018 . THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATIVITY LEVELS OF STUDENTS READING IN PRIVATE AND STATE SCHOOLS AND TEAC-HERS' CREATIVE THINKING LEVELS . The Journal of Academic Social Science.DOI:10.16992/ASOS.13570
Rıdvan GÖREN.(2018).THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATIVITY LEVELS OF STUDENTS READING IN PRIVATE AND STATE SCHOOLS AND TEAC-HERS' CREATIVE THINKING LEVELS.The Journal of Academic Social Science
Rıdvan GÖREN,"THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATIVITY LEVELS OF STUDENTS READING IN PRIVATE AND STATE SCHOOLS AND TEAC-HERS' CREATIVE THINKING LEVELS" , The Journal of Academic Social Science (2018)
Rıdvan GÖREN . 2018 . THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATIVITY LEVELS OF STUDENTS READING IN PRIVATE AND STATE SCHOOLS AND TEAC-HERS' CREATIVE THINKING LEVELS . The Journal of Academic Social Science . 2018. DOI:10.16992/ASOS.13570
Rıdvan GÖREN .THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATIVITY LEVELS OF STUDENTS READING IN PRIVATE AND STATE SCHOOLS AND TEAC-HERS' CREATIVE THINKING LEVELS. The Journal of Academic Social Science (2018)
Rıdvan GÖREN .THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATIVITY LEVELS OF STUDENTS READING IN PRIVATE AND STATE SCHOOLS AND TEAC-HERS' CREATIVE THINKING LEVELS. The Journal of Academic Social Science (2018)
Format:
Rıdvan GÖREN. (2018) .THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATIVITY LEVELS OF STUDENTS READING IN PRIVATE AND STATE SCHOOLS AND TEAC-HERS' CREATIVE THINKING LEVELS The Journal of Academic Social Science
Rıdvan GÖREN . THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATIVITY LEVELS OF STUDENTS READING IN PRIVATE AND STATE SCHOOLS AND TEAC-HERS' CREATIVE THINKING LEVELS . The Journal of Academic Social Science . 2018 doi:10.16992/ASOS.13570
Rıdvan GÖREN."THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATIVITY LEVELS OF STUDENTS READING IN PRIVATE AND STATE SCHOOLS AND TEAC-HERS' CREATIVE THINKING LEVELS",The Journal of Academic Social Science(2018)
Quote